Matt Burgess wrote: > On Mon, 2012-03-05 at 21:06 +0000, Matt Burgess wrote: > > >> That led me to wonder why we bother passing the other '--enable' options >> (partx, arch and write). For reference, Bruce brought up 'arch' in >> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/lfs-dev/2012-February/065811.html >> and partx/write are discussed in >> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/lfs-dev/2008-October/061763.html. > > Note to self: Test things *before* raising points for discussion. > > It turns out that --enable-partx is now the default, so we can simply > remove the option and its description, but still retain the partx > utilities. > > My proposal, therefore, is to use Coreutils' 'arch' instead of > Util-Linux's, and to not install 'write'.
My proposal is to just skip 'arch' completely as I do not believe it is not used anywhere in LFS/BLFS. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
