Matt Burgess wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-03-05 at 16:59 -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> Matt Burgess wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2012-03-05 at 16:00 -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>>>
>>>> My proposal is to just skip 'arch' completely as I do not believe it is
>>>> not used anywhere in LFS/BLFS.
>>> Ah yes, so it is. Do you mind if I make that change as part of #3002?
>> Not at all.
>
> OK, as mentioned in my closing comments in #3002, --enable-new-mount
> causes problems, so has been omitted from this upgrade.
>
> 1) S00mountvirtfs mounts /run using 'mount -n /run'
> 2) S40mountfs then remounts the virtfses using 'mount -f /run'
>
> That 2nd mount, instead of just updating /etc/mtab, as is documented in
> mount(8), actually remounts the fs. This results in
> the /run/{var,lock,shm} directories being hidden under the 2nd mount and
> therefore warnings are spewed at bootime about /run/var/bootlog not
> being found.
Matt, I have a suggestion for testing. Comment out the mount on
S40mountfs and see what is in /proc/mounts on startup. Then try a
manual mount -f /run and see what happens.
You can also try a `cat /proc/mounts` in S40mountfs to see what the
kernel thinks at that point.
-- Bruce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
