On Mon, 2012-03-05 at 16:59 -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Matt Burgess wrote:
> > On Mon, 2012-03-05 at 16:00 -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> > 
> >> My proposal is to just skip 'arch' completely as I do not believe it is 
> >> not used anywhere in LFS/BLFS.
> > 
> > Ah yes, so it is.  Do you mind if I make that change as part of #3002?
> 
> Not at all.

OK, as mentioned in my closing comments in #3002, --enable-new-mount
causes problems, so has been omitted from this upgrade.

1) S00mountvirtfs mounts /run using 'mount -n /run'
2) S40mountfs then remounts the virtfses using 'mount -f /run'

That 2nd mount, instead of just updating /etc/mtab, as is documented in
mount(8), actually remounts the fs.  This results in
the /run/{var,lock,shm} directories being hidden under the 2nd mount and
therefore warnings are spewed at bootime about /run/var/bootlog not
being found.

I'll report this apparent regression upstream.

Regards,

Matt.

-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to