On 11/03/2014 12:08 AM, Kenneth Harrison wrote: > No objection, but would this affect the main book for systemd and > information there-in? >
No. Development will continue in git instead of svn, so users using snapshots will need to switch their local repositories. Online book will be set up to generate from the new git repository instead of the current svn. In other words, normal users wouldn't notice any changes. Just developers and people who build their own svn snapshots. > On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 2:45 PM, Armin K. <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hello everyone. >> >> I was thinking about moving LFS systemd to a git repository on github, >> but first wanted to notify the list. >> >> Given that I'm the only contributor at the moment, with Chris jumping in >> to help on some occassions, I find it easier to use git than svn, >> especially for managing a big number of small patches and doing merges >> (which I won't be able since I'll be moving only the systemd branch). >> >> Does anyone object on that? I know it would be a downside that a more or >> less official project is being hosted somewhere else, but I don't recall >> that LFS server hosts any git repositories, so github is my best bet. >> >> In case nobody objects, current editors can either send me their public >> ssh key for commit access or send pull requests or git formatted patches >> (the latter two apply for everyone else). -- Note: My last name is not Krejzi.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
