On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 10:45 PM, Armin K. <[email protected]> wrote: > Given that I'm the only contributor at the moment, with Chris jumping in > to help on some occassions, I find it easier to use git than svn, > especially for managing a big number of small patches and doing merges > (which I won't be able since I'll be moving only the systemd branch). > > Does anyone object on that? I know it would be a downside that a more or > less official project is being hosted somewhere else, but I don't recall > that LFS server hosts any git repositories, so github is my best bet. > > In case nobody objects, current editors can either send me their public > ssh key for commit access or send pull requests or git formatted patches > (the latter two apply for everyone else).
It's a lot easier to do pull requests and to track development via github than it is to do so from the current system. Also better branching allows for a wider set of experiments. I'd vote yes. For instance I'd be interested in switching the book over to markdown from docbook which I think would make it more accessible. Kevin -- Kevin Lyda Galway, Ireland -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
