On 02-11-2014 20:35, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
> I don't have any significant objections, but question the need in this
> case. First of all you are the only one making changes to the systemd
> book. Secondly, there are only a very few packages that are different
> between trunk and systemd. Lets look:
>
> Chapter 5 is identical AFAICT.
>
> In Chapter 6 the differences are:
>
> lfs has sysvinit and eudev.
> systemd has dbus and systemd.
>
> The util-linux page in Chapter 6 has an option
> --with{,out}-systemdsystemunitdir and --without-systemd
>
> Did I miss any differences?
>
> Of course there are text differences in Chapter 7 and 8
>
> By transitioning, you remove the capability to browse both versions in
> Trac and the ability to match specific commits to tickets.
>
> The commits won't automatically be sent to lfs-book for others to review.
>
> Overall it's an open source project and you are free to clone it as you
> see fit, but I think it would be better in this case to leave things as
> they are.
Yes. And it should be called Krejzi Part 1.
And then Armin has everything as he likes.
But I don't think he has no right to remove anything from our servers.
So, he should open his book with his name and with parts 1
(corresponding to LFS) and 2 (corresponding ro BLFS).
As I wrote in blfs dev, it is a "coup d'état", taking over the control,
work against LFS.
Only problem I see is copyright, for use the name BLFS or LFS.
--
[]s,
Fernando
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
