On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 05:59:20PM -0500, William Harrington wrote: > On Fri, 11 Sep 2015 21:08:16 +0100 > Ken Moffat <[email protected]> wrote: > > > FAIL: rt/tst-mqueue5 > > > > Comparing my i3 build (LFS as at 1st September) I only saw > > proteccted1{a,b} and getaddrinfo{4,5} - I suspect all of the others > > are because I'm using AMD (yeah, I'm paranoid :) The > > double-vlen{2,4} do not ring any bells, but I think I've seen > > -double and -idouble on my other AMD box. > > > > As with all tests - they probably mean nothing on their own ;) > > > > ĸen > Message queuing is tested and the output is at rt/tst-mqueue5.out > > The test is time sensitive and may fail while using the system or the system > is slow. > > Sincerely, > > William Harrington
Thanks. In my case, the host system was running X with 3 or 4 terms (urxvt) open, and probably running xscreensaver during the tests. The box had probably throttled back to its lowest cpufreq. ISTR that my AMD boxes drop to lower frequencies than my i3, and probably do less per Hz. ĸen -- Il Porcupino Nil Sodomy Est! (if you will excuse my latatian) aka "The hedgehog song" -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
