On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 03:33:10AM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 05:59:20PM -0500, William Harrington wrote:
> > On Fri, 11 Sep 2015 21:08:16 +0100
> > Ken Moffat <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > FAIL: rt/tst-mqueue5
> > >
> > > Comparing my i3 build (LFS as at 1st September) I only saw
> > > proteccted1{a,b} and getaddrinfo{4,5} - I suspect all of the others
> > > are because I'm using AMD (yeah, I'm paranoid :) The
> > > double-vlen{2,4} do not ring any bells, but I think I've seen
> > > -double and -idouble on my other AMD box.
> > >
> > > As with all tests - they probably mean nothing on their own ;)
> > >
> > > ĸen
> > Message queuing is tested and the output is at rt/tst-mqueue5.out
> >
> > The test is time sensitive and may fail while using the system or the
> > system is slow.
> >
> > Sincerely,
> >
> > William Harrington
>
> Thanks. In my case, the host system was running X with 3 or 4 terms
> (urxvt) open, and probably running xscreensaver during the tests.
> The box had probably throttled back to its lowest cpufreq. ISTR
> that my AMD boxes drop to lower frequencies than my i3, and probably
> do less per Hz.
>
I've now completed a further build up to the end of chapter 6, on
the same machine _from_ 7.8-rc1 (i.e. the old "can it build itself"
test, but without getting hung up on whether or not the files are
identical). This time, that test did NOT fail!
So, my revised view is now trimmed down to 'it may *sometimes* fail'.
Interestingly, I got a fourth failure in the perl tests - originally
only
../cpan/Socket/t/getnameinfo.t
../dist/IO/t/io_multihomed.t
../dist/IO/t/io_sock.t
now also
../cpan/Time-HiRes/t/itimer.t
Looks good.
ĸen
--
Il Porcupino Nil Sodomy Est! (if you will excuse my latatian)
aka "The hedgehog song"
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
