On 3 September 2017 at 16:59, Richard Melville <[email protected]> wrote:
> I've just noticed that, certainly for the recent past, each new final
> release has been labelled thus: "LFS Stable Version x.x Release", however,
> the current release is shown as: "LFS 8.1 Release", omitting "Stable
> Version". Is this a deliberate change in format or an error? I'm asking
> because the change is likely to confound my script.
>
>
This is what I've scraped:-
<dt>LFS 8.1 Release</dt>
<dt>LFS 8.1-rc2 Release</dt>
<dt>LFS 8.1-rc1 Release</dt>
<dt>LFS Stable Version 8.0 Release</dt>
<dt>LFS 8.0-rc1 Release</dt>
<dt>LFS Stable Version 7.10 Release</dt>
<dt>LFS 7.10-rc1 Release</dt>
<dt>LFS Stable Systemd Version 7.9 Release</dt>
<dt>LFS 7.9 Stable Release</dt>
<dt>LFS 7.9-rc2 Release</dt>
<dt>LFS 7.9-rc1 Release</dt>
<dt>LFS 7.8 Stable Release</dt>
<dt>LFS 7.8-rc1 Release</dt>
<dt>LFS 7.7 Stable Release</dt>
<dt>LFS 7.7-rc1 Release</dt>
<dt>LFS 7.6 Stable Release</dt>
<dt>LFS 7.6-rc1 Release</dt>
Is there any chance of arriving at some consistency? Maybe either: "LFS
<version number> Stable Release" or, as the latest states: "LFS <version
number> Release", for those that are not release candidates, obviously.
Richard
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
