On 3 September 2017 at 18:16, Bruce Dubbs <[email protected]> wrote:
> Richard Melville wrote:
>
>> I've just noticed that, certainly for the recent past, each new final
>> release has been labelled thus: "LFS Stable Version x.x Release", however,
>> the current release is shown as: "LFS 8.1 Release", omitting "Stable
>> Version". Is this a deliberate change in format or an error? I'm asking
>> because the change is likely to confound my script.
>>
>
> Just an oversight. I didn't realize it was used in a script. Fixed.
Thanks Bruce; is that the format that will be used from now on because the
stable version number *always* followed the "LFS" text until fairly
recently (version 7.9 Systemd or 7.10 for both), as you can see below?
That makes more sense to me as it ties in with the release candidates and
creates continuity.
<dt>LFS 8.1 Release</dt>
<dt>LFS 8.1-rc2 Release</dt>
<dt>LFS 8.1-rc1 Release</dt>
<dt>LFS Stable Version 8.0 Release</dt>
<dt>LFS 8.0-rc1 Release</dt>
<dt>LFS Stable Version 7.10 Release</dt>
<dt>LFS 7.10-rc1 Release</dt>
<dt>LFS Stable Systemd Version 7.9 Release</dt>
<dt>LFS 7.9 Stable Release</dt>
<dt>LFS 7.9-rc2 Release</dt>
<dt>LFS 7.9-rc1 Release</dt>
<dt>LFS 7.8 Stable Release</dt>
<dt>LFS 7.8-rc1 Release</dt>
<dt>LFS 7.7 Stable Release</dt>
<dt>LFS 7.7-rc1 Release</dt>
<dt>LFS 7.6 Stable Release</dt>
<dt>LFS 7.6-rc1 Release</dt>
Richard
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
