Richard Melville wrote:
<dt>LFS 8.1 Release</dt> <dt>LFS 8.1-rc2 Release</dt> <dt>LFS 8.1-rc1 Release</dt> <dt>LFS Stable Version 8.0 Release</dt> <dt>LFS 8.0-rc1 Release</dt> <dt>LFS Stable Version 7.10 Release</dt> <dt>LFS 7.10-rc1 Release</dt> <dt>LFS Stable Systemd Version 7.9 Release</dt> <dt>LFS 7.9 Stable Release</dt> <dt>LFS 7.9-rc2 Release</dt> <dt>LFS 7.9-rc1 Release</dt> <dt>LFS 7.8 Stable Release</dt> <dt>LFS 7.8-rc1 Release</dt> <dt>LFS 7.7 Stable Release</dt> <dt>LFS 7.7-rc1 Release</dt> <dt>LFS 7.6 Stable Release</dt> <dt>LFS 7.6-rc1 Release</dt>Is there any chance of arriving at some consistency? Maybe either: "LFS <version number> Stable Release" or, as the latest states: "LFS <version number> Release", for those that are not release candidates, obviously.
That file is edited manually. As I said in my earlier message, I updated it to include 'Stable Version'.
You could do something like: $ grep 'LFS.*Release' news.html | grep -v rc | \ > sed -r 's/.*([0-9].[0-9]).*/\1/' 8.1 8.0 7.1 7.9 7.9 7.8 7.7 7.6 -- Bruce -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
