On Fri, 22 Dec 2017 15:04:47 -0600 Bruce Dubbs <[email protected]> wrote:
> Ken Moffat wrote: > > Just an initial note that I'm getting one test failure in tar: > > > > 92: link mismatch FAILED > > (difflink.at:19) > > > > Past experience suggests it is likely to be specific to me, but I'll > > report it upstream when I have a moment. > > > > Google found a link comparing the test file between 1.29 and 1.30 at > > https://fossies.org/diffs/tar/1.29_vs_1.30/tests/testsuite-diff.html > > which shows this seems to be a new test. > > Know issue. From the mailing list: > > diff --git a/tests/difflink.at b/tests/difflink.at > index eadfb08..4e01176 100644 > --- a/tests/difflink.at > +++ b/tests/difflink.at > @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ mkdir a > genfile -f a/x > ln -s x a/y > ln a/y a/z > -tar cf a.tar a > +tar cf a.tar a/x a/y a/z > rm a/z > ln -s x a/z > tar df a.tar Hello Bruce, Which mailing list? Have a link? The test passes for me. Using a current CLFS build in the running instance. Two people. One passes. One fails. Need more info here. The patch may help it PASS, but I want to know why, and there is not enough info. Sincerely, William Harrington -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
