Berzerkula wrote:
On Fri, 22 Dec 2017 15:04:47 -0600
Bruce Dubbs <[email protected]> wrote:
Ken Moffat wrote:
Just an initial note that I'm getting one test failure in tar:
92: link mismatch FAILED (difflink.at:19)
Past experience suggests it is likely to be specific to me, but I'll
report it upstream when I have a moment.
Google found a link comparing the test file between 1.29 and 1.30 at
https://fossies.org/diffs/tar/1.29_vs_1.30/tests/testsuite-diff.html
which shows this seems to be a new test.
Know issue. From the mailing list:
diff --git a/tests/difflink.at b/tests/difflink.at
index eadfb08..4e01176 100644
--- a/tests/difflink.at
+++ b/tests/difflink.at
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ mkdir a
genfile -f a/x
ln -s x a/y
ln a/y a/z
-tar cf a.tar a
+tar cf a.tar a/x a/y a/z
rm a/z
ln -s x a/z
tar df a.tar
Hello Bruce,
Which mailing list? Have a link?
The test passes for me. Using a current CLFS build in the running
instance. Two people. One passes. One fails. Need more info here. The
patch may help it PASS, but I want to know why, and there is not enough
info.
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-tar/2017-12/txtHO4Jt7HaLP.txt
## ------------------------ ##
## Summary of the failures. ##
## ------------------------ ##
Failed tests:
GNU tar 1.30 test suite test groups:
NUM: FILE-NAME:LINE TEST-GROUP-NAME
KEYWORDS
92: difflink.at:17 link mismatch
diff difflink
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-tar/2017-12/msg00027.html
-- Bruce
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
