On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 04:10:35PM -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Berzerkula wrote: > > On Fri, 22 Dec 2017 15:04:47 -0600 > > Bruce Dubbs <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Ken Moffat wrote: > > > > Just an initial note that I'm getting one test failure in tar: > > > > > > > > 92: link mismatch FAILED > > > > (difflink.at:19) > > > > [...] > > > > Hello Bruce, > > > > Which mailing list? Have a link? > > > > The test passes for me. Using a current CLFS build in the running > > instance. Two people. One passes. One fails. Need more info here. The > > patch may help it PASS, but I want to know why, and there is not enough > > info. > > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-tar/2017-12/txtHO4Jt7HaLP.txt
and > > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-tar/2017-12/msg00027.html Looks like a broken test, although a followup (nsg00028) suggests other random failures on fedora in different architectures. FWIW I get the same failure on the completed system when building as a user, and it is not related to forcing an unsafe configure (which we have to do in chroot). But I haven't tried building it on any older systems, nor fixing the test to match that second link. ĸen -- Truth, in front of her huge walk-in wardrobe, selected black leather boots with stiletto heels for such a barefaced truth. - Unseen Academicals -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
