scsijon wrote:
I've been going through a number of 'linux's' lately looking for a
particular problem and it's fix (yeah, I know there are plenty out
there). I am starting to notice a fair few of the smaller 'workstation
only' ones that were systemd have / are / considering changing to
Gentoo's OpenRC. I was wondering on the lfs thoughts in general of
creating at least a test build, and how much work it would be to create.
SHEISH!
All I was asking was on the groups thoughts and how hard it is to create
another LFS (Test) Build document! Like from maybe 'someone / those' who
has 'built / created / tried to create' one. Maybe some guidance,
warnings on 'gotchas' and the other major problems I might come across,
or already created templates and the like was the expected response!
I did comment on what was found while doing a problem fix troll through
the resultant type of systemd "Linux variations" as they seem to be
those who considered / gone the OpenRC path. I had also searched through
non-systemd variations. I somehow thought this may be of interest for some.
I admit, and have done before, that I don't use systemd, being from the
Puppy Linux world and back to Yggdrasil(, where i'm a proud owner of two
different cdrom booksets and one set on hard format 5 1/4" floppy's with
a typed manual from 1992).
Also, personally, nowadays, i'm use to using either busybox's init or
toybox's nowadays but did once have a look at runit.
So, my origonal question still stands unanswered!
scsijon
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
