On Tue, 9 Aug 2005, Lyn St George wrote: > > Ah .. my error. This is the Hardened LFS book. (I had copied the pages > into .sh scripts, which were placed in the LFS-6.1 directory created when > the Automated LFS package untarred. Completely confused myself here ..) > > I built an LFS5.1 system some time ago with the same system of copying > pages into .sh scripts, but now I have been given reason to build a > hardened version. Is this the wrong list then? Is the hardened version > perhaps not so well tested? >
You might (sometimes) do better on hlfs-dev, although that isn't really a support list. Certainly, hlfs hasn't had a release yet, and fewer people here understand it's differences. Is this the uclibc version of hlfs, or the glibc ? You said that when you tried to persuade it that it wasn't cross-compiling, you got a message about no rule to make pty_.c needed by pty_.o - in my limited experience, that sort of message (missing .c file) implies a broken attempt at cross-compiling. Probably, you should check if all of the needed patches for this flavour of the book exist and apply without error (I've written scripts that happily carry on when patches don't apply, with strange results a lot later). Also, does the ALFS package match the version of the book ? Ken -- das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
