Jeremy Huntwork wrote these words on 08/09/05 12:06 CST: > Also FYI, I was told not to bother with re-diffing patches. One I > re-diffed did happen to get accepted for the repository, but only after it > was shown that the 'fuzzy' patch created a couple of unwanted files.
I was required by policy to add the rediffed patch to the LFS repo. :-) I created it, and applied it, for the BLFS instructions, and all BLFS patches must also be in the LFS repo. I didn't want to have to field all the support questions for why the patch applies with fuzz and stuff and just rediffed it so that these types of issues (this thread mentions the fuzz could be a problem for the OP) don't happen. -- Randy rmlscsi: [GNU ld version 2.15.94.0.2 20041220] [gcc (GCC) 3.4.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.4] [Linux 2.6.10 i686] 12:08:01 up 129 days, 11:41, 2 users, load average: 1.21, 0.96, 0.69 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
