On 1/26/06, Niki Kovacs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What I'd like eventually is a basic One-CD-distro that builds LFS out of the > box. I know that there is a LiveCD, but I'll often reboot during breaks to do > 30 minutes or an hour of LFS there and then, and I think a host system > installed on hard disk would come in more handy than a LiveCD where I have to > reconfigure xorg.conf after every reboot. (Or can the LiveCD be installed on a > hard disk?) Besides, I reckon a LiveCD eats up some resources, at least RAM. > Correct me if I'm wrong here. Precious resources needed for compiling.
I had no problem with LFS LiveCD 6.1, and I've got only 256 MB RAM. I understand you about the configuration at each reboot. I found it useful to save the files that I used to modify in a partition of the hard disk, and also some scripts. Hope this helps. > Quoting Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > > > Warning - Slackware <10 has problems acting as a build host. For your > > > first build you may want to consider a better host distro > > > > He's using Slack 10.2. Why is that a problem? I've never heard this > > before. > > > > Well, although I really like Slack 10.2 as an everyday distro, I'm not > particularly anal about using it as a host system. After reading various IMHO, you can have a try using your Slack as a host system, if you don't feel well with the LiveCD. Just guessing here, though. Cheers Luca -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
