Ken Moffat said: >I was going to delay replying until after this mail claimed to have >been sent, but I got bored ;-) Please can you fix your date ?
I would be happy to fix it. I'm getting this problem since I've installed the "host" system that I'm using to work on my LFS. It seems that every time I switch from win to linux via reboot the timesetting changes for some weird reasons. I've not checked it yet (I have no idea where to put my hands. as I said yet: forgive my ignorance. I suppose no one of you is born linux-learned. :P). Anyway, now I'm on win and the timesetting should be fixed. Sorry for this. >> make: *** [preplibrary] Error 1 >> >> >> in case you want to see also the content of the logfile, here it is: >> >> >> gs "optimize='-O2'" perlmain.o` perlmain.c >'gs' as in 'ghostscript', or damage in copy-and-paste ? Damage in copy and paste. There is a "`sh cfla" before that, just like in all the other lines which follows. sorry again. (--;) (/me slaps himself.) >I assume you must be the person who raised ticket 1977, and >therefore you've worked round the problem. I've still not solved the problem. And I don't even know what you means with "ticket 1977". If this has something to do with the fact that my replies are not correctly placed in a thread-like sequence, like I'm noticing by checking the mailing list archive, I'm sorry, but this is not my fault. I suppose that the number you're referring to is an id used for every new submitted problem, or something like this (so that 1977 was mine). But I'm now getting the emails using the "digest" method, and occasionally checking the replies directly via web page. On the web page I cannot see any number like this. There is just a number for the HTML file name, but it has 6 digits, not 4. Nor a number like this is reported on the sections of the digest. (While the digest itself, instead, uses a different numeration, which at present time has reached number 1162.) Also the digest header say: «When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of lfs-support digest..."» It says to edit it, but not in what way. So I'm just sending my replies by prepending "Re: " to the subject, which doesn't seems to be the correct way. If this doesn't work, I really don't know what to do to fix it. I'm sorry, but if the service manager doesn't provide me corrects instructions, I can't do better then this. :/ But again this is not my real problem. I'm still trying to understand what's wrong with that perl. :P some ideas? :| yayo -- yayo's software & codes: - TRASHY (http://trashy.sourceforge.net/index.php) - pXw4Pa (http://pxw4pa.sourceforge.net/index.php) -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
