On Tue, 2009-04-07 at 10:48 -0500, Mike McCarty wrote: > Simon Geard wrote: > > If we were *really* following standard practice, we'd be applying the > > errata changes against the 6.4 book, and putting a 6.4.1 book on the > > website to replace it. > > Can't dispute. You'd do a "point release".
Right, which I assume is what the other poster was arguing for. The idea of an errata page is very much a legacy of hardcopy publishing - for purely electronic documents, the software model of fix and re-release makes much more sense. No idea how big a deal it would be to do, but in theory it's highly automatible... Simon.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
