On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 10:59 -0500, Mike McCarty wrote: > A point release should go through full QA, which is why it would > be a big deal, require full directory structure creation, regresion > testing, etc. Someone would have to go through the full build > following the book exactly.
Seems to me that if it's eligible to go in the errata, it's eligible to go into the book proper. After all, if we're telling people to read the errata to deal with errors in the book, surely we're taking care not to put new errors into the errata? Simon.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
