>> A point release should go through full QA, which is why it would >> be a big deal, require full directory structure creation, regresion >> testing, etc. Someone would have to go through the full build >> following the book exactly. >> >> Mike
This might be above my head, but why does a point release require these things while an errata sheet does not? If the errata sheet is used then it modifies the procedure just like a point release does, right? So the resulting procedure that would actually govern a build and installation is the same regardless of if an errata or point release is used and it is the procedure that needs to be tested. What am i missing? -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
