Ken Moffat wrote:
> 2009/12/7 Mykal Funk <[email protected]>:
>
>> Ken Moffat wrote:
>>
>>> Do you have CONFIG_COMPAT_VDSO=y ? If so, try turning it off.
>>>
> whoops, if not try turning it on.
>
>>> I'm not sure where it appears in menuconfig, but the help says:
>>>
>>> config COMPAT_VDSO
>>> def_bool y
>>> prompt "Compat VDSO support"
>>> depends on X86_32 || IA32_EMULATION
>>> ---help---
>>> Map the 32-bit VDSO to the predictable old-style address too.
>>> ---help---
>>> Say N here if you are running a sufficiently recent glibc
>>> version (2.3.3 or later), to remove the high-mapped
>>> VDSO mapping and to exclusively use the randomized VDSO.
>>>
>>> If unsure, say Y.
>>>
>>> LFS-5.0 used gcc-2.3.2 so it will need this set to Y.
>>>
>>> ĸen
>>>
>>>
>> No. I compiled the kernel without COMPAT_VDSO. Do you think it needs
>> included? The host is running Glibc 2.3.3. I think system may be a LFS
>> 5.1. I didn't write a file anywhere to tell me, but I know it was build
>> April 2004 with the then stable book.
>>
>> Thank,
>> Mykal Funk
>> --
>>
> Yes, all the main hits on google for "inconsistency detected by ld.so"
> appear to suggest that will fix it. Sorry for the thinko in my earlier
> reply.
>
> You can determine the version of glibc by running /lib/libc.so.6
>
> ĸen
>
Thanks a bunch, Ken. I got a kernerl working! Now to build the LFS 6.5
and see how everything goes. If it all goes well, I can go back to
lurking. :)
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
