> From: Ken Moffat <[email protected]>
>
>  OK, I was just pointing out that we cannot know what is in your

Yes, I don't post them only because I don't want to waste your time
trying to understand them.

Do you want the bash-4.2 ShellShock patch file posted?  It might be
worth an erratum.

> time without noticing the difference.  So, it always pays to review if
> there is any doubt.

Been through twice, starting again. ;-)

>  Also, I repeat what Bruce said - for one or two errors in the tests
>  for a toolchain package, carry on.

Well, I don't know about the abi_check.  I thought because the make
scripts dropped out the upstream folk didn't think that was a
recoverable error.  You think it's negligible?

>  Building there is ok, if somewhat unusual.  It just seems like an odd
>  place to build things which are part of the base system, and

I use /usr/local/src for all my building, LFS/BLFS/other, and I like to
keep all of it together.  LSB isn't strict about what goes there.

>  Other things can happen (heat, component failure, transient errors).
>  A quick look at an x86_64 log for e2fsprogs-1.42.5 suggests that it
>  uses 'CC' as the compiler, not 'CXX', so a libstdc++ ABI change seems
>  unlikely to impact e2fsprogs.

Maybe not, but eventually it'd bite me.  So what about my root
environment variables?  Could it be those?  Is there some (other) way I
can ensure it builds for any i686?  (Expect the compressors & encrypters
would use the most advanced enhanced instructions they can find, unless
told not to.)
-- 
Paul Rogers
[email protected]
http://www.xprt.net/~pgrogers/
Rogers' Second Law: "Everything you do communicates."
(I do not personally endorse any additions after this line. TANSTAAFL :-)

        

-- 
http://www.fastmail.com - The way an email service should be

-- 
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Do not top post on this list.

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style

Reply via email to