Em 22-08-2015 15:39, Fernando de Oliveira escreveu: > Attached, you find a patch with the necessary fix, if you don't want to > modify in a non-standard way your system. > > It is for 5.0.0, but will probably be OK with your version. > > >
Never mind, your non-LSB compliant symlink is the best solution. I have been educated in two things, with this last thread: 1. To be Linux Standards Base (LSB) compliant is not a serious objective, here. In LFS, it is a rhetorical argument for remaking all bootscripts, telling people they are wrong and increasing LFS version from 6 to 7. 2. I will be wrong each time I post (B)LFS lists. Correct: keep up my determination of not posting. Apologies for having posted. I had recently had the same problem. Will try not to let it happen again. -- []s, Fernando -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
