On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 2:53 PM, Michael Havens <[email protected]> wrote:
> I think maybe a recompile from the section after glibc is in order. I say > the chapter after because it appears as if gibc compiled correctly. Not > hearing any responses by tomorrow I will assume the is agreement with my > plan. > > On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 12:24 AM, Michael Havens <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I didn't deviate from the book though. I followed their instructions to >> the tee. >> >> On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 10:07 PM, William Harrington < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> On Sun, 01 Nov 2015 17:19:32 -0600 >>> Bruce Dubbs <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> > > the complete makelog is found: >>> > > >>> > > http://pastebin.com/GFtFP9Ng >>> > >>> > Well the lines like >>> > >>> > /tools/lib/libpthread.so.0: undefined reference to >>> `__getrlimit@GLIBC_PRIVATE' >>> >>> All of the GLIBC_PRIVATE lines seem to me like you are attempting to use >>> LTO. Are you using LTO? >>> >>> You are only one person out of many who can't build a complete system >>> without many errors which you can easily search the last ten years of >>> archives from many mailing lists. the LFS devs build every day but use book >>> commands and don't deviate from the book. When you need help you explain >>> your deviances from the book.I think I found the problem! '&&' is waiting >>> for input. I was taught that what it does is if the last command exits in >>> anything other than zero it halts the program. Please, what does && do? >>> >> > I think I found the problem! '&&' is waiting for input. I was taught that >> what && does is if the last command exits in anything other than zero it >> halts the program. Please, what does && do? >> I figured this out by not waiting for approval to redo glibc and when I >> separately executed a command with '&&' it went to the next line and >> presented a '>'. >> -- >> :-)~MIKE~(-: >> > > > > -- > :-)~MIKE~(-: > -- :-)~MIKE~(-:
-- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
