> From: Michael Havens <[email protected]>
> Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2015 07:39:15 -0500
> To: LFS Support List <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] 5.33
>
> On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 5:58 PM, William Harrington <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > run the following, your interpreter may be wrong or missing:
> >
> > readelf -e /tools/bin/ls | grep interp
> >
>
> ~$ readelf -e /tools/bin/ls | grep interp
> bash: /tools/bin/readelf: No such file or directory
> bash: /tools/bin/grep: No such file or directory
>
>
> >
> > It should be using /tools/lib or /tools/lib64
> >
> > You can check all of the binaries in /tools/bin if you want.
> >
>
>  $ ls /tools/bin
> bash: /tools/bin/ls: No such file or directory
>
> I don't know what I did to LFS. Guess I'll start over.
> here is my history <http://pastebin.com/N5RamvxH>.


Have you done something simple like got $PATH wrong - e.g. have you
incorrectly put a space after the first colon, such that it's only looking
in /tools/..... , and skipping /bin &c.


What do you get from:

echo $PATH


Also, when doing the above 'readelf ...' and 'ls ...', try it with the
full paths - e.g. '/usr/bin/readelf ...' (or '/bin/readelf ...' if nec),
'/bin/ls ...'  .


If you just type 'cp' or 'mv' or 'readelf' or 'ls' &c, without full or
relative pathnames, then normally $PATH is searched for the command.


Also, you should be able to verify what $LFS says; plus whether /tools/bin/
exists and is mounted, and what it contains; plus whether you are in chroot
or not.


Last thing, as a general point, stated again: it really really is normally
very useful to have built the book manually at least once, prior to trying
scripting it.



hth,

akh



> -- 
> :-)~MIKE~(-:


--
-- 
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Do not top post on this list.

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style

Reply via email to