> From: Michael Havens <[email protected]> > Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2015 09:45:12 -0500 > To: LFS Support List <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [lfs-support] 5.33 > . . > > > > Last thing, as a general point, stated again: it really really is normally > > very useful to have built the book manually at least once, prior to trying > > scripting it. > > > > That is exactly what I am going to do. I am copying the text out of the > scripts and pasting them in. >
Copy'n'paste the commands carefully from THE BOOK: NOT from your scripts. I looked at your earlier pastebinned history ( http://pastebin.com/N5RamvxH ) : not a forensic analysis, so apols if am wrong on the following. Even allowing for apparent gaps/discontinuities in history lists due to e.g. changing user, it looks like an extremely garbled sequence. E.g.: ==== ref: numbered-line '426.' ff (== history-command '440' ff): == * you do glibc, then kernel-headers [wrong order]; * then glibc again (with duplicate 'make' command 473./474. , and three 'make-install' commands 475./479./484. , with a sprinkling of gcc test-compile stuff ); * then some faffing around with mpfr/gmp [again, out of proper sequence]; * commands run together (e.g. 463./488./497.) with not always apparent correction. * re 'echo GOOD'/'tee ...log'/'exit $PIPESTATUS': NB that you are of course changing at least some book commands; you still need to be sure that your amended commands are valid; else just stick to the book commands literally. ==== I know you've since gone on to at least one 'fresh' approach: but it needs to follow the book; and certainly not the likes of what's in that history list. Bear in mind also: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/stable/prologue/prerequisites.html akh > -- > :-)~MIKE~(-: -- -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
