>Thanos, thanks for killing this spurious "it appeared to fail" >thread. I've just looked at one of my own 7.8 logs - I had assumed >that configure ended with that warning, but in my case it appeared >during configure's run. Not quite sure how James even managed to >notice it, he must have kept a log, or at least looked at config.log >(which would be deleted when the source directory was deleted by his >script).
This is not a spurious it appeared to fail thread. When I first encountered the Warnings the first thing I did was find the report in the archives and the suggestion this could be ignored. I followed that advice and it came back to bite me in chapter 6 while building the system. That's I've gone over and over it again and again. Anyway, I'll now proceed to build following chapter 6. And then post if it breaks again like last time. -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
