On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 10:20:31PM +0000, Read, James C wrote: > >Thanos, thanks for killing this spurious "it appeared to fail" > >thread. I've just looked at one of my own 7.8 logs - I had assumed > >that configure ended with that warning, but in my case it appeared > >during configure's run. Not quite sure how James even managed to > >notice it, he must have kept a log, or at least looked at config.log > >(which would be deleted when the source directory was deleted by his > >script). > > This is not a spurious it appeared to fail thread. When I first encountered > the Warnings the first thing I did was find the report in the archives and > the suggestion this could be ignored. I followed that advice and it came back > to bite me in chapter 6 while building the system.
OK, I can now see that the warning _was_ repeated at the end of configure. My apologies for not spotting that - in my defence, it's a long log and I'm busy. But: again you haven't divulged, at least recently, what error you got in chapter 6 which made you think this was causing the problem. Nor which host distro you are using. ĸen -- This email was written using 100% recycled letters. -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
