Working out of the LFS 7.9 Book. Got to section 6.58 Kbd-2.0.3 w/o any problems. When running configure command,
*PKG_CONFIG_PATH=/tools/lib/pkgconfig ./configure --prefix=/usr --disable-vlock* received the following error: *checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c checking whether build environment is sane... yes checking for a thread-safe mkdir -p... /bin/mkdir -p checking for gawk... gawk checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes checking for pkg-config..08:26shomper... /usr/bin/pkg-config checking pkg-config is at least version 0.9.0... yes checking for CHECK... no configure: error: Package requirements (check >= 0.9.4) were not met: No package 'check' found Consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if you installed software in a non-standard prefix. Alternatively, you may set the environment variab08:27shomperles CHECK_CFLAGS and CHECK_LIBS to avoid the need to call pkg-config. See the pkg-config man page for more details.* There was an online post <http://archive.linuxfromscratch.org/mail-archives/lfs-dev/2013-September/068377.html> referencing this same problem (Sep 2013), but the answer was adjust PKG_CONFIG_PATH to what is already referenced in LFS book I see that Check0.10 is part of the Chapter 5 sources, but not called for in Chapter 6. Is this an omission? Should I install check-0.10.0 and re-try install kbd-2.0.3? Thanks for any help, Keith -- Dr Keith Shomper Professor of Computer Science Cedarville University Ph: 937 766 3786 FAX: 937 766 7631 Email: [email protected]
-- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
