Gentlemen (Bruce, Ken, Thanos) ... Thank you for the reference to /tool/lib/pkgconfig/check.pc. It was indeed missing. I must have failed to "make install" at the last of that section.
Once I re-accomplished section 5.14, kbd-2.0.3 proceeded smoothly. v/r Keith On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 3:29 PM, Thanos Baloukas <[email protected]> wrote: > On 27/06/2016 08:50 μμ, Shomper, Keith A wrote: > >> Working out of the LFS 7.9 Book. Got to section 6.58 Kbd-2.0.3 w/o any >> problems. When running configure command, >> >> /PKG_CONFIG_PATH=/tools/lib/pkgconfig ./configure --prefix=/usr >> --disable-vlock/ >> >> received the following error: >> >> /checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c >> checking whether build environment is sane... yes >> checking for a thread-safe mkdir -p... /bin/mkdir -p >> checking for gawk... gawk checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes >> checking for pkg-config..08:26shomper... /usr/bin/pkg-config >> checking pkg-config is at least version 0.9.0... yes >> checking for CHECK... no >> configure: error: Package requirements (check >= 0.9.4) were not met: >> No package 'check' found >> Consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if you >> installed software in a non-standard prefix. >> Alternatively, you may set the environment variab08:27shomperles >> CHECK_CFLAGS >> and CHECK_LIBS to avoid the need to call pkg-config. >> See the pkg-config man page for more details./ >> >> There was an online post >> < >> http://archive.linuxfromscratch.org/mail-archives/lfs-dev/2013-September/068377.html >> > >> referencing this same problem (Sep 2013), but the answer was adjust >> PKG_CONFIG_PATH to what is already referenced in LFS book >> >> I see that Check0.10 is part of the Chapter 5 sources, but not called >> for in Chapter 6. Is this an omission? Should I install check-0.10.0 and >> re-try install kbd-2.0.3? >> >> Hi Keith > > If you haven't done already, check if check-0.10.0 installation in /tools > is ok. > In chroot do > > ls -l /tools/lib/pkgconfig/check.pc && cat /tools/lib/pkgconfig/check.pc > ls -l /tools/lib/libcheck* > > The results should be the same outside chroot too, > if the /tools -> $LFS/tools symlink on the host is ok. > > -- > Thanos > > > -- > http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support > FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html > Unsubscribe: See the above information page > > Do not top post on this list. > > A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. > Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? > A: Top-posting. > Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style > -- Dr Keith Shomper Professor of Computer Science Cedarville University Ph: 937 766 3786 FAX: 937 766 7631 Email: [email protected]
-- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
