Many thanks for your reply Hazel. I won't be surprised to have made a mistake but I must say I concentrated hard during every step. I have the following in the /tools/lib folder:
"-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1203304 Aug 4 15:55 libquadmath.a -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 971 Aug 4 15:55 libquadmath.la lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 20 Aug 4 15:55 libquadmath.so -> libquadmath.so.0.0.0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 20 Aug 4 15:55 libquadmath.so.0 -> libquadmath.so.0.0.0 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 955232 Aug 4 15:55 libquadmath.so.0.0.0" Does this indicate a mistake? On Mon, 6 Aug 2018 at 11:26, Hazel Russman <hazeldeb...@googlemail.com> wrote: > On Mon, 6 Aug 2018 10:05:37 +0200 > John Le Brasseur <johnlebrass...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi. > > > > My first post. > > (Sorry for ignorance) > > > > I am using the LFS-BOOK-8.2 > > I have reached step 6.18.1. > > Everything has gone according to plan so far unless I missed something. > > I ran 'make check' for mpfr-4.0.1 and all tests failed with similar > > comments, e.g.: > > > > "./tzeta_ui: error while loading shared libraries: libquadmath.so.0: > cannot > > open shared object file: No such file or directory > > FAIL tzeta_ui (exit status: 127)" > > > > Is this a common error? > > What could likely be wrong? > > Should I make mpfr again? > > Is there likely a problem elsewhere? > > Any ideas? > > > > Many, many thanks. > > > > John > > > > -- > > Kind regards, > > > > John Le Brasseur > > No, it's not normal. It's a serious error which means that you have made a > mistake in Chapter 5 (probably in Section 5.10). > > Libquadmath, which this build needs, is part of gcc. The first pass of gcc > in Chapter 5 disables it, but the second pass includes it. So you should > have it installed in the /tools tree. Check in /tools/lib for it. > > If it isn't there, then you probably reused the gcc source tree for your > second pass instead of deleting it and re-extracting your gcc sources. > > It looks like you will need to start again. > > -- > -- > http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support > FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html > Unsubscribe: See the above information page > > Do not top post on this list. > > A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. > Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? > A: Top-posting. > Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style > -- Kind regards, John Le Brasseur
-- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
