On Sat, Oct 27, 2018 at 05:07:25PM +0200, Dr.-Ing. Edgar Alwers wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I just finished building  LFS-8.3 with kernel 4.18.5.  However, if I try to
> build something, I just get a message "compiler lacks asm-goto support". I
> have been looking at googleand found a comment
> "https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=239500"; saying
> 
> "gcc 8.2 supports asm-goto but the the kernel build detects the compiler in
> use does not".
> The final comment of the user was :"I managed to fix this by re-installing
> the kernel", without further indications. Can someone tell me, what I should
> change in the configuration of kernel 4.18.5 ? Or what is happening in my
> new LFS ?
> 
> Thanks for any help,
> Edgar
> 
> 

Hi, Edgar.

We had a similar report last month.  Thread from this problem starts at
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/lfs-support/2018-September/052401.html
but I don't think we got any conclusion.

He had at least one earlier problem, but we never heard if he
eventually succeeded.  From my comments at
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/lfs-support/2018-September/052409.html
it seems his toolchain was broken.

Bruce suggested this was due either to missing a package (all worked
fine when /tools was on the PATH, but not afterwards), or something
when wrong in adjusting the toolchain.

All I can suggest for a first step is: change your PATH so that
/tools is not on it, and try to untar and configure a small package
(one which uses configure, obviously).  If that reports that the C
compiler cannot create executables then one of those suggestions
seems to apply. (We know that until the end of chapter 6 the compiler
was apparently working).  OTOH, if without /tools you can still
configure and compile then I don't know.

ĸen
-- 
                        Is it about a bicycle ?
-- 
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Do not top post on this list.

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style

Reply via email to