On Sat, 16 May 2020 11:06:01 -0600 LFS Support List lfs-support@lists.linuxfromscratch.org said
On Sat, May 16, 2020, 11:02 Dr.-Ing. Edgar Alwers <edgaralw...@gmx.de> wrote: > Am 16.05.20 um 17:50 schrieb Flareon Zulu: >> Eudev is not the last package to install, > Sorry, read Chapter 6 of LFS-9.1, installing Basic System Software. it > _is_ the last package ! >> and there's a clearly defined way to get back int the environment if >> you have to restart. > I know this, it is not my first building, but even the book advices NOT > to interrupt the building process if not needed >> Can you actually look at the lines before the make lines? What you >> gave us is no help. ? > > Have you had a look to the instructions ? What would you like to have ? > The "make" process delivers some hundreds of lines, starting with "make > all-recursive" and ending with "Libraries have been installed > in:/usr/lib " and a longer comment starting with "If you ever happen to > want to link against installed libraries in a given directory, LIBDIR, > you must either use libtool ....."
That message is normal when libtool is used.
> > "make check" delivers > > # PASS: 2 not aply > # SKIP: 0 > # XFAIL: 0 > # FAIL: 0hwdw > # XPASS: 0 > # ERROR: 0 >
Looks like you have interleaved output from multiple processes here, also in what you originally posted. It would be worth using make -j 1 for installs, though I can't find any excuse for the extra bits in a normal install output . They may be part of the error messages which must have existed above what was in your original post. I know what a normal output looks like because I did this build on 1 May, and I have the log. I had no problems at all with eudev. BTW, the output in your original post was from 3.2.8 - I know you tried that as well as 3.2.9, but it would have been better to have the 3.2.9 output. Eric. -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
