On 19-06-2020 22:33, Frans de Boer wrote:
On 19-06-2020 22:15, Pierre Labastie wrote:
On Fri, 2020-06-19 at 21:13 +0200, Frans de Boer wrote:
Dear all,
I follow every step but always stumble on the '$LFS_TGT-gcc dummy.c'
-
in the first glibc.c section - in that crti.o can't be located by ld.
Looking for crti.o, I find it residing in the $LFS/usr/lib64
directory.
That's the weird thing, /usr/lib64 shouldn't exist. It's the setting of
libc_cv_slibdir, which prevents that.
So, why can't ld find it?
gcc has been told (with the "case" instruction) to ask ld to look into
/usr/lib, not /usr/lib64.
Pierre
I will check if the sed was successful.
--- Frans.
I checked and the result of the sed was as expected. Only glibc creates
the usr/lib64 directory.
In the past the /usr/lib64 directory was a link to /usr/lib. Also, due
to experimenting, I also found in the past that for some adaptations I
needed to execute next for glibc:
# When going for a specific architecture, change some literals /lib into
/lib64 or /lib32
#
if [[ ilibType -eq elibTYPE_LIB && $bldTARCH == "x86_64" ]]; then
#
# Change literal /lib64 into /lib with no architecture depended directories
sed -r -i -e 's@(/lib)64(/ld-linux)@\1\2@'
./sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/ldconfig.h
sed -i -e 's@6, "/lib64", 6@4, "/lib", 4@' \
-e 's@len >= 6 \&\& ! memcmp @len >= 4 \&\& ! memcmp @'
./sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/dl-cache.h
sed -r -i -e 's@(lib)64@\1@g'
./sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64{,/64}/configure{,.ac}
# sed -i -e 's@die "ldd execution failed" if $?;@# &@'
./scripts/test-installation.pl
sed -r -i -e 's@(RTLDLIST=.*\\2)64@\1@'
./sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/ldd-rewrite.sed
fi
-------
The above (maybe somewhat dated) is an example when NOT having the
/usr/lib64 directory, either as link or directory. So, it is clear - so
it seems - that we need some more tuning, or revert to having /usr/lib64
as just a link.
Suggestions?
---- Frans.
--
A: Yes, just like that A: Ja, net zo
Q: Oh, Just like reading a book backwards Q: Oh, net als een boek
achterstevoren lezen
A: Because it upsets the natural flow of a story A: Omdat het de natuurlijke
gang uit het verhaal haalt
Q: Why is top-posting annoying? Q: Waarom is Top-posting zo
irritant?
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Do not top post on this list.
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
