On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 10:31:58AM +0400, Anatoly Nenashev wrote: > On 28.03.2011 09:20, Reinhard Tartler wrote: >> [...] >> While both these comments are valid, I really hope that they don't >> intimidate potential contributors from participating. I guess Anton >> wants to submit his code for both FFmpeg and Libav, but doesn't bother >> enough to maintain two versions of his patch. These issues really >> shouldn't a reason to scare him off of nor to reject his patch, and I >> hope this is also Anatoly's understanding!
I don't care if Anatoly makes the change or whomever commits his patch, I just want to point out the issue, at least as a reminder to the person pushing the patch. That said, I would prefer to Libav in the license header. > I really don't care what project name will be pointed in license header > but I don't know the right way to submit patch for both projects. > Well, I can change license header in Libav thread. How it will be > cherry-picked to FFmpeg or I should make two versions of patch? > Did you have any agreements with FFmpeg developers about such things? They cherrypick or merge our changes. 80-90% of the changes going into FFmpeg originate in Libav these days. Diego _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list libav-devel@libav.org https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
