On 05/16/2011 04:07 PM, Måns Rullgård wrote:
>> > Then we would have:
>> >
>> > for (blk = 0; blk < AC3_MAX_BLOCKS; blk++) {
>> > uint8_t *bap = s->ref_bap[ch][blk];
>> > for (i = start; i < end; i++)
>> > mant_cnt[blk][bap[i]]++;
>> > }
> This looks more asm-friendly.
Before I send a new patch... would there be an advantage on ARM either
way between (start pointer, len) vs. (pointer, start, end)?
-Justin
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
