Justin Ruggles <[email protected]> writes: > On 05/16/2011 04:07 PM, Måns Rullgård wrote: > >>> > Then we would have: >>> > >>> > for (blk = 0; blk < AC3_MAX_BLOCKS; blk++) { >>> > uint8_t *bap = s->ref_bap[ch][blk]; >>> > for (i = start; i < end; i++) >>> > mant_cnt[blk][bap[i]]++; >>> > } >> This looks more asm-friendly. > > Before I send a new patch... would there be an advantage on ARM either > way between (start pointer, len) vs. (pointer, start, end)?
Start, len is probably easier to deal with. The difference is minimal anyway. -- Måns Rullgård [email protected] _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
