On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 2:53 PM, Luca Barbato <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 08/08/2011 11:27 PM, Benjamin Larsson wrote:
>> On 08/08/2011 11:13 PM, Jason Garrett-Glaser wrote:
>>> 2011/8/8 Jindřich Makovička <[email protected]>:
>>>> On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 19:03, Alex Converse <[email protected]> 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> Plenty of other names were proposed in the last thread were fine:
>>>>> avtool, avengine, avconvert. I don't like the others as much but they
>>>>> are all better than "av."
>>>> I think avconvert is most reasonable. It is descriptive enough and it
>>>> doesn't collide with an antivirus/rootkit/trojan when googling for it.
>>>> (searching for avengine returns plenty of links to Panda Antivirus,
>>>> avtool.exe is apparently the Zenyth trojan).
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Jindrich Makovicka
>>> I support avconvert.
>>>
>>> Jason
>>
>> An ok name for me also.
>
> too long. av, avx, avenc are all better.
>
> You want to type the least number of letter and this is NOT imagemagick.
>
> If you are not ok with av please pick a name that is between 3 and 5
> letters at most.

So you think we should rename avserver and avplay?

Jason
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel

Reply via email to