On 08/08/2011 11:57 PM, Jason Garrett-Glaser wrote: > On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 2:53 PM, Luca Barbato <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 08/08/2011 11:27 PM, Benjamin Larsson wrote: >>> On 08/08/2011 11:13 PM, Jason Garrett-Glaser wrote: >>>> 2011/8/8 Jindřich Makovička <[email protected]>: >>>>> On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 19:03, Alex Converse <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> Plenty of other names were proposed in the last thread were fine: >>>>>> avtool, avengine, avconvert. I don't like the others as much but they >>>>>> are all better than "av." >>>>> I think avconvert is most reasonable. It is descriptive enough and it >>>>> doesn't collide with an antivirus/rootkit/trojan when googling for it. >>>>> (searching for avengine returns plenty of links to Panda Antivirus, >>>>> avtool.exe is apparently the Zenyth trojan). >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Jindrich Makovicka >>>> I support avconvert. >>>> >>>> Jason >>> >>> An ok name for me also. >> >> too long. av, avx, avenc are all better. >> >> You want to type the least number of letter and this is NOT imagemagick. >> >> If you are not ok with av please pick a name that is between 3 and 5 >> letters at most. > > So you think we should rename avserver and avplay?
I'm happy if we get this discussion solved quickly and we get back improving the code =) avserver and avplay as names aren't a regression and I'm happy with them even if avserver is too long by my definition. lu -- Luca Barbato Gentoo/linux http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
