On Mon, Aug 08, 2011 at 11:53:53PM +0200, Luca Barbato wrote:
> On 08/08/2011 11:27 PM, Benjamin Larsson wrote:
> > On 08/08/2011 11:13 PM, Jason Garrett-Glaser wrote:
> >> 2011/8/8 Jindřich Makovička <[email protected]>:
> >>> On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 19:03, Alex Converse <[email protected]> 
> >>> wrote:
> >>>> Plenty of other names were proposed in the last thread were fine:
> >>>> avtool, avengine, avconvert. I don't like the others as much but they
> >>>> are all better than "av."
> >>> I think avconvert is most reasonable. It is descriptive enough and it
> >>> doesn't collide with an antivirus/rootkit/trojan when googling for it.
> >>> (searching for avengine returns plenty of links to Panda Antivirus,
> >>> avtool.exe is apparently the Zenyth trojan).
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Jindrich Makovicka
> >> I support avconvert.
> >>
> >> Jason
> > 
> > An ok name for me also.
> 
> too long. av, avx, avenc are all better.
> 
> You want to type the least number of letter and this is NOT imagemagick.
> 
> If you are not ok with av please pick a name that is between 3 and 5
> letters at most.
> 

Here are some extra ideas if you want:

  avapp   (libav application)
  avbin   (in the same vein)
  avalter (sounds like "walter", but with a/v and alteration idea)
  avmake  (well, it's used to "make" a/v outputs)
  avtr    (transcode, transform, etc.)
  avmaria (sorry, could'nt resist)

I won't defend any of these, I'm not part of the project. You mentionned
the possibility to anyone to propose names in a previous mail so…

Maybe some were already proposed, I didn't follow/remember everything.

-- 
Clément B.

Attachment: pgpiXdJQ1VQJY.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel

Reply via email to