On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 11:26:34AM -0400, Sean McGovern wrote: > > Not to sound buzzword-compliant or anything but how should I be moving > forward on this patch.
I may not have understood the situation completely yet, but you do some munging for Solaris, when it only seems to be required on Solaris x86, when building with Sun Studio cc, so your solution appears to still do too much collateral damage. > If it's not welcome then I should just drop both it > and the Solaris Studio FATE runs and stop pretending that we build with > anything that isn't gcc? We build with many non-gcc compilers :) Diego _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
