On 15/09/2011 18:23, Sean McGovern wrote: > Not to sound buzzword-compliant or anything but how should I be moving > forward on this patch. If it's not welcome then I should just drop both it > and the Solaris Studio FATE runs and stop pretending that we build with > anything that isn't gcc?
I guess we dug a bit too deep the issue, but at least now everybody know what's missing to get this feature is in the assembler. That said, I guess we could hopefully land a proper patch for it soon. Thanks for the patience. lu -- Luca Barbato Gentoo/linux http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
