Sean McGovern <[email protected]> writes: > On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 1:05 PM, Luca Barbato <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 15/09/2011 18:23, Sean McGovern wrote: >>> Not to sound buzzword-compliant or anything but how should I be moving >>> forward on this patch. If it's not welcome then I should just drop both it >>> and the Solaris Studio FATE runs and stop pretending that we build with >>> anything that isn't gcc? >> >> I guess we dug a bit too deep the issue, but at least now everybody know >> what's missing to get this feature is in the assembler. >> >> That said, I guess we could hopefully land a proper patch for it soon. >> >> Thanks for the patience. >> > > Here's the same on avconv built with suncc (without the patch, but > with several other patches I would like to submit soon that help at > least complete the build): > > sean@tsukimi:/BUILD/libav.sol10$ file ./avconv > ./avconv: ELF 64-bit LSB executable AMD64 Version 1 [SSSE3 SSE3 SSE2 > SSE FXSR AMD_3DNowx AMD_3DNow MMX CMOV TSC FPU], dynamically linked, > not stripped > > Here's an attempt to run the suncc version: > > sean@tsukimi:/BUILD/libav.sol10$ ./avconv > ld.so.1: avconv: fatal: hardware capability unsupported: 0x300 [ > AMD_3DNowx AMD_3DNow ] > Killed > > See the problem?
I never said there was no problem. I am merely trying to first figure out exactly what causes it, then to solve it correctly. -- Måns Rullgård [email protected] _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
