On Mon, 17 Oct 2011, Luca Barbato wrote:

On 10/17/11 4:52 AM, Martin Storsjö wrote:
So, what's the consensus on how to move forward with this?

You have a nice patchset sitting here that could probably go as is, in the future I'd like to provide the +proto option, to our tools at least, since it is simpler for the user.

Ok then.

The patchset is still missing ok on patch #3 and #5 iirc.

// Martin
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel

Reply via email to