On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 03:21:09PM +0100, Anton Khirnov wrote: > > On Thu, 15 Dec 2011 12:16:33 +0100, Luca Barbato <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 15/12/11 09:04, Alex Smith wrote: > > > --- > > > Changelog | 1 + > > > LICENSE | 1 - > > > Makefile | 3 +- > > > cmdutils.c | 2 - > > > configure | 9 +- > > > doc/APIchanges | 4 +- > > > libavutil/avutil.h | 1 - > > > libpostproc/Makefile | 6 - > > > libpostproc/libpostproc.v | 4 - > > > libpostproc/postprocess.c | 1071 -------- > > > libpostproc/postprocess.h | 104 - > > > libpostproc/postprocess_altivec_template.c | 1215 ---------- > > > libpostproc/postprocess_internal.h | 179 -- > > > libpostproc/postprocess_template.c | 3632 > > > ---------------------------- > > > 14 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6226 deletions(-) > > > delete mode 100644 libpostproc/Makefile > > > delete mode 100644 libpostproc/libpostproc.v > > > delete mode 100644 libpostproc/postprocess.c > > > delete mode 100644 libpostproc/postprocess.h > > > delete mode 100644 libpostproc/postprocess_altivec_template.c > > > delete mode 100644 libpostproc/postprocess_internal.h > > > delete mode 100644 libpostproc/postprocess_template.c > > > > > > > It has a number of users (MPlayer, VLC) and given how simple the api is > > might be a good thing trying to clean it up. > > > > I see no point in pretending it's a part of Libav, when it's clearly > not. Nobody has maintained it since forever and apparrently nobody wants > to. > Let's get rid of it, whoever uses it can pull it from history.
+42 optionally I nominate Diego for maker of standalone libpostproc _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
