Hi On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 10:50 AM, Derek Buitenhuis <[email protected]> wrote: > On 15/12/2011 9:21 AM, Anton Khirnov wrote: >> >> I see no point in pretending it's a part of Libav, when it's clearly >> not. Nobody has maintained it since forever and apparrently nobody wants >> to. >> Let's get rid of it, whoever uses it can pull it from history. > > > Some things that use it, like FFMS2, have started deprecating > their postproc-based stuff. IMHO it should probably be considered > a legacy lib, and moved somewhere else (a separate repo, not > maintained by Libav, perhaps), rather than nuked completely out > of existence.
Diego, are you interested in doing this? Ronald _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
