On Do, Dez 29, 2011 at 06:42:23 (CET), Ronald S. Bultje wrote: > Hi > > On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 10:50 AM, Derek Buitenhuis > <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 15/12/2011 9:21 AM, Anton Khirnov wrote: >>> >>> I see no point in pretending it's a part of Libav, when it's clearly >>> not. Nobody has maintained it since forever and apparrently nobody wants >>> to. >>> Let's get rid of it, whoever uses it can pull it from history. >> >> >> Some things that use it, like FFMS2, have started deprecating >> their postproc-based stuff. IMHO it should probably be considered >> a legacy lib, and moved somewhere else (a separate repo, not >> maintained by Libav, perhaps), rather than nuked completely out >> of existence. > > Diego, are you interested in doing this?
TBH, I'd prefer to keep libpostproc for 0.8¹, and nuke it for 0.9. For now, let's change configure to not buil it by default and issue a big deprecation warning in configure when the user enables it. Cheers, Reinhard 1: yes, it'll happen soon now, I'll give a status update when I get back home. I'm currently on 'vacation' in Berlin. -- Gruesse/greetings, Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4 _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
