On 28/12/2011 11:51 AM, Måns Rullgård wrote:
Looks like it belongs in a more central place to avoid scattering such checks across all demuxers. Hasn't this come up before
Good question. I do sort of wonder... why is sample_rate signed at all? How does a negative sample rate even make sense? - Derek _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
